波多野结衣办公室双飞_制服 丝袜 综合 日韩 欧美_网站永久看片免费_欧美一级片在线免费观看_免费视频91蜜桃_精产国品一区二区三区_97超碰免费在线观看_欧美做受喷浆在线观看_国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb_麻豆精品国产传媒

The proposed IPO (initial public offering) reform is back in the news.

Unsurprisingly, the latest salvo was fired by the trade organization representing stockbrokers ahead of the hearing in the Legislative Council (LegCo) on Tuesday. The problem is that the brokers have failed to break new ground in objecting to the proposal.

But, there's nothing new in their latest manifesto apart from repeating the old argument that the proposed reform is unacceptable as it could undercut the authority and effectiveness of the stock exchange's listing committee. As a result, the initiative of vetting IPO applications and formulating listing policies would be transferred to the regulatory agency.

At the LegCo hearing, a representative of the Securities and Futures Commission contended that the aim of the reform was to facilitate and streamline the IPO approval process rather than an attempt to grab power, as suggested by some stockbrokers. He also refuted allegations that the reform plan contravened the securities ordinance.

It's not hard to understand why the stock-broking community is so dead set against the plan that seeks to establish a structure allowing regulators to be involved in the initial vetting process. Under the existing arrangement, the regulators have the veto power, but aren't involved in the process.

The proposed arrangement would enable the regulators to identify irregularities in the applications so that unqualified applicants can be weeded out during the vetting. But, critics of the reform insisted that the regulators have already had the power to block the listing of companies. For that reason, they questioned the need for change.

If that's the case, the more pertinent question is why are stockbrokers still arguing against the proposed reform which, according to them, would change nothing.

Critics also charged that the reform, if it goes through, would "chock off" market vitality and inhibit the market's development. That doesn't sound all that convincing. A well-regulated IPO market can only help to enhance investor confidence in Hong Kong as an international financial center.

(HK Edition 04/21/2017 page9)