富國(guó)并不比窮國(guó)幸福。根據(jù)蓋洛普2015年發(fā)布的全球幸福體驗(yàn)指數(shù)，貧窮的南美國(guó)家巴拉圭位居榜首。89%的巴拉圭人說:“他們經(jīng)歷了很多快樂，經(jīng)常開懷地笑，休息的很好并且能夠得到尊重。”而只有79%的美國(guó)人和75%的中國(guó)人表達(dá)了同樣的觀點(diǎn)。

By David Blair

I recently stumbled on a youtube video of "The Happy Baby Song." Caspar Addyman and Lauren Stewart, both psychologists at Goldsmiths, University of London, used babies' brainwaves to find out what kinds of sounds make them happy. They like, for example, words that start with the letters "P" and "B", but not with "L". They like the pitch to be in the range of a female human voice, with fast tempos. Grammy award winning songwriter Imogen Heap used this research to write a song designed to make babies happy.
我最近偶然在YouTube上發(fā)現(xiàn)了《快樂寶貝歌》的視頻。倫敦大學(xué)金史密斯學(xué)院的兩位心理學(xué)家卡斯帕?阿迪曼和勞倫?斯圖爾特通過嬰兒的腦電波找出讓嬰兒們開心的音樂。比如，寶寶們喜歡以字母“P”和“B”開頭的單詞，而以字母“L”開頭的單詞不那么受他們青睞。寶寶們喜歡快節(jié)奏的女性音調(diào)。格萊美獎(jiǎng)得主、作曲家伊莫金?希普利用這項(xiàng)研究創(chuàng)作了一首旨在讓寶寶快樂的歌曲。

It worked. All the babies in the video started laughing on hearing the song.
這個(gè)歌很管用。視頻中所有寶寶聽到這首歌時(shí)都開始大笑。

I hope they are working on a "Happy Old Man" song next.
我希望接下來(lái)有作曲家能寫一首《快樂老頭歌》。

Bhutan, the tiny Buddhist kingdom in the Himalayans, included the goal of enhancing "Gross National Happiness" in its 2008 constitution. Amazingly, the country's legal code of 1729 states "if the government cannot create happiness for its people, there is no purpose for the government to exist. Famously, the US Declaration of Independence says the reason governments exist is to secure the rights of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." The similar Chinese concept of "harmony" goes all the way back to Confucius.
不丹坐落于喜馬拉雅山腳下，是一個(gè)很小的佛教王國(guó)。該國(guó)將提高“國(guó)民幸福指數(shù)”的目標(biāo)寫入2008年的《憲法》。令人不可思議的是，1729年的不丹的法律就規(guī)定，“如果政府不能為人民創(chuàng)造幸福，那么就失去了存在的價(jià)值。”美國(guó)《獨(dú)立宣言》有句著名的話：政府存在的原因就是要保障人們“生存、自由和追求幸福”的權(quán)利。而中國(guó)也有相似的概念，孔子時(shí)期就曾提出“和諧”。

Unfortunately, GDP, which is the main metric of success for all countries, except Bhutan, has very little to do with happiness. It's just a measure of the "goods and services" produced by the country.
不幸的是，GDP是所有國(guó)家（除了不丹）衡量成功的主要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而它與幸福幾乎沒有關(guān)系。GDP只是衡量國(guó)家生產(chǎn)的“商品和服務(wù)”的指標(biāo)。

But, some of those goods are really "bads." A company spewing chemicals into a lake would count as an increase in GDP, but no one would be happier—except maybe the company's owner. Ironically, cleaning up the lake also counts as GDP. Putting a million new cars on Beijing's roads would count as GDP, but almost everyone would be made less happy.
但是，有些商品確實(shí)是“垃圾貨”。公司向湖水中排放的化學(xué)物質(zhì)將會(huì)計(jì)入GDP的增長(zhǎng)，但除了公司的所有者，沒有人會(huì)感到高興。具有諷刺意味的是，清理湖水也算作GDP增長(zhǎng)。北京的道路上增加一百萬(wàn)輛新車會(huì)被看成GDP的增長(zhǎng)，但幾乎所有人都對(duì)此感到不開心。

Rich countries are not happier than poor ones. According to the 2015 Gallup Positive Experience Index, the poor South American country of Paraguay ranked happiest in the world. 89% of its people said "they experienced a lot of enjoyment, smiled of laughed a lot, felt well-rested and felt treated with respect." 79% of American and 75% of Chinese agree with that statement.
富國(guó)并不比窮國(guó)幸福。根據(jù)蓋洛普2015年發(fā)布的全球幸福體驗(yàn)指數(shù)，貧窮的南美國(guó)家巴拉圭位居榜首。89%的巴拉圭人說：“他們經(jīng)歷了很多快樂，經(jīng)常開懷地笑，休息的很好并且能夠得到尊重。”而只有79%的美國(guó)人和75%的中國(guó)人表達(dá)了同樣的觀點(diǎn)。

Research by Nobel prize winning economists Angus Deaton and Daniel Kahneman concluded that, in the US, happiness increases with income up to about $75,000 per year. In most regions, that is about the amount a family needs to pay for the basics of life—food, housing, medical care, education, and the cars needed for transportation. After that, additional income does not lead to additional happiness. Logically, people could be made happy for less money if medical care and education were not so ridiculously expensive and if a better, cheaper, and a safer transportation system could be built.
諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)得主、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家安格斯?迪頓和丹尼爾?卡尼曼的研究認(rèn)為，在美國(guó)，幸福感會(huì)隨著收入的增加而增加，但是能帶給人幸福感的收入是有上限的，約為年薪7.5萬(wàn)美元。在大多數(shù)地區(qū)，7.5萬(wàn)美元是一個(gè)家庭需要支付基本生活必需品的費(fèi)用，這其中包括食物、住房、醫(yī)療保健、教育和出行工具。超過7.5萬(wàn)美元時(shí)，額外的收入并不會(huì)帶來(lái)更多的幸福。從邏輯上講，如果醫(yī)療和教育不那么昂貴，而且交通系統(tǒng)能夠更加完善、便宜、安全，讓人們感到幸福的金錢數(shù)量會(huì)下降。

Research consistently shows that two factors are key to happiness--opportunities for social interaction and having a feeling of accomplishment. But in many countries, especially rich countries, society is structured to maximize goods production, while work time squeezes out social time.
研究反復(fù)證明，擁有社交互動(dòng)的機(jī)會(huì)和成就感是獲得幸福的兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵因素。但是在許多國(guó)家，特別是富國(guó)，社會(huì)的結(jié)構(gòu)就是為了最大限度地?cái)U(kuò)大商品生產(chǎn)，工作時(shí)間擠壓了社交時(shí)間。

Too many people in the US work long hours and commute long distances so they can afford big houses, big cars and other material things, but they lose touch with their children and don't know their neighbors. Dangerous, car-dependent cities deprive us of needed exercise, force us to waste time on the roads, and take away the places kids need to play. Of course, there are high pressure jobs and long commutes in China, too. But, many Chinese have been able to stick with family-based traditions.
在美國(guó)，有太多的人長(zhǎng)時(shí)間地工作，長(zhǎng)距離地通勤，他們通過努力買到了大房子、好汽車和其他物質(zhì)產(chǎn)品，但他們失去了與孩子的溝通，也不認(rèn)識(shí)自己的鄰居。現(xiàn)在的城市越來(lái)越依賴汽車，也因此變得更加危險(xiǎn)。我們?nèi)鄙倭吮匾腻憻挘坏貌辉诼飞侠速M(fèi)時(shí)間，孩子們也沒有可以玩耍的地方了。當(dāng)然，中國(guó)也存在高壓工作和遠(yuǎn)距離通勤。但是，很多中國(guó)人能夠堅(jiān)守以家庭為核心的傳統(tǒng)。

Countries are like people. They need to concentrate on material goods up to a point. After that, other things are much more important.
國(guó)家的發(fā)展如同人的發(fā)展。國(guó)家需要把注意力集中在物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)上，但當(dāng)GDP增長(zhǎng)到一定的程度后，其他事情就變得更加重要了。

英文來(lái)源：“CHINA DAILY”微信公眾號(hào)
翻譯：劉晨菲
編審：丹妮 董靜
音頻編輯：焦?jié)?/p>

更多內(nèi)容請(qǐng)關(guān)注“CHINA DAILY”微信公眾號(hào)：

Broadcaster

David Blair writes for the international weekly editions of China Daily.