波多野结衣办公室双飞_制服 丝袜 综合 日韩 欧美_网站永久看片免费_欧美一级片在线免费观看_免费视频91蜜桃_精产国品一区二区三区_97超碰免费在线观看_欧美做受喷浆在线观看_国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb_麻豆精品国产传媒

 
 
 

Snake oil?

中國日報網 2018-07-03 11:28

 

Reader question:

Please explain “Trump’s tax cut snake oil”. Snake oil?

My comments:

Yeah, snake oil, oil made from the fat of snakes. Snake oil is one of many forms of voodoo medicine, which is believed to be effective but people seldom fully understand how it works. In traditional Chinese medicine, for example, snake oil is believed to be able to relieve pain and work many other incredible wonders.

Incredible is the right word here (in the sense of impossible to believe) because the medicinal effectiveness of snake oil has always been dubious, doubtful and questionable, especially in the West. In the West, where any medicinal cure has to go through vigorous scientific proofs and checks, privately concocted remedies such as the snake oil are necessarily controversial.

And, thing is, whenever someone sells you a bottle of snake oil, he is never modest about its efficacy. He does not say it relieves pain and generally makes you feel better and leaves it at that. He almost always touts his snake oil as a miraculous cure-all, curing anything and everything, from pain in the neck to liver cancer.

Another thing about snake oil is, of course, that it may not even be made from snake oil at all. It could be anything but snake oil. It’s kind of like many medicines purportedly made from tiger bones. Even though tigers have largely been driven to extinction in most parts of the world, we still hear tiger bone this, tiger bone that – as often as before, if not more often.

“Other people use dog bones or ox bones”, we can hear a vendor say. “But mine are tiger bones only.”

For sure.

Anyways, snake oil as a metaphor is synonymous with quack medicine or any unproven remedy, any hyped-up cure-all or panacea, anything that’s purportedly wonderful but may in fact be worthless.

Hence and therefore, in our example, when Donald Trump’s tax cut plan is likened to a snake oil remedy, we understand that it probably won’t work. Trump may say cutting taxes cures all American economic ills and ailments. He may say that all American workers will benefit from it. He may say all kinds of wonderful things about his plan, but it may prove to be just another big lie.

In other words, his tax cut plans are a hyped-up quack concoction of snake oil. Trump is, as they say, a snake oil salesman, a quack doctor, a big mouth and a phony, a fraud.

All right, here are media examples of snake oil and snake oil salesman:

1. “Snake Oil Salesman.” The phrase conjures up images of seedy profiteers trying to exploit an unsuspecting public by selling it fake cures. In fact, the Oxford English Dictionary defines snake oil as “a quack remedy or panacea.” What the OED does not note, however, is that the history of snake oil is linked to an often forgotten chapter of Asian-American history.

Because the words “snake oil” are so evocative, it has been a favorite go-to phrase for politicians and lobbying groups on both sides of the aisle. Earlier this month, Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell called his opponent in the Republican primary, Tea Party candidate Matt Bevin, a snake oil salesman in a campaign mailer. While campaigning for a second term last year, President Obama referred to the Romney-Ryan tax plan as “trickle-down snake oil” at a rally. In 2008, the Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund took out full-page ads in The Washington Post to denounce then-President George W. Bush’s plan to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, calling it “100 percent snake oil.”

But what, exactly, is snake oil? And why is peddling it such a terrible thing?

The 1800s saw thousands of Chinese workers arriving in the United States as indentured laborers to work on the Transcontinental Railroad. According to historian Richard White’s book Railroaded, about 180,000 Chinese immigrated to the United States between 1849 and 1882. The vast majority of the workers came from peasant families in southeastern China and were signed to contracts that ran up to five years for relatively low wages (compared with their white counterparts), wrote David Haward Bain in his book Empire Express.

Among the items the Chinese railroad workers brought with them to the States were various medicines — including snake oil. Made from the oil of the Chinese water snake, which is rich in the omega-3 acids that help reduce inflammation, snake oil in its original form really was effective, especially when used to treat arthritis and bursitis. The workers would rub the oil, used for centuries in China, on their joints after a long hard day at work. The story goes that the Chinese workers began sharing the oil with some American counterparts, who marveled at the effects.

So how did a legitimate medicine become a symbol of fraud? The origins of snake oil as a derogatory phrase trace back to the latter half of the 19th century, which saw a dramatic rise in the popularity of “patent medicines.” Often sold on the back pages of newspapers, these tonics promised to cure a wide variety of ailments including chronic pain, headaches, “female complaints” and kidney trouble. In time, all of these false “cures” began to be referred to as snake oil.

As word of the healing powers of Chinese snake oil grew, many Americans wondered how they could make their own snake oil here in the United States. Because there were no Chinese water snakes handy in the American West, many healers began using rattlesnakes to make their own versions of snake oil.

This set the stage for entrepreneur Clark Stanley, aka The Rattlesnake King. In an 1897 pamphlet about Stanley's life and exploits, the former cowboy claimed he had learned about the healing power of rattlesnake oil from Hopi medicine men. He never publicly mentioned Chinese snake oil at all. Stanley created a huge stir at the 1893 World's Exposition in Chicago when he took a live snake and sliced it open before a crowd of onlookers.

Joe Schwarcz, the director of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society, described the scene in this 2008 article:

“[Stanley] reached into a sack, plucked out a snake, slit it open and plunged it into boiling water. When the fat rose to the top, he skimmed it off and used it on the spot to create ‘Stanley’s Snake Oil,’ a liniment that was immediately snapped up by the throng that had gathered to watch the spectacle.”

There were two major problems with Stanley’s claim about his oil:

First, rattlesnake oil was far less effective than the original Chinese snake oil it was trying to emulate. A 1989 letter to The Western Journal of Medicine from psychiatrist and researcher Richard Kunin revealed that the Chinese oil contained almost triple the amount of a vital acid as did rattlesnake oil.

Secondly, Stanley’s Snake Oil didn’t contain any snake oil at all. The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 sought to clamp down on the sale of patent medicines and it was that legislation that led to Stanley’s undoing. After seizing a shipment of Stanley’s Snake Oil in 1917, federal investigators found that it primarily contained mineral oil, a fatty oil believed to be beef fat, red pepper and turpentine. That’s right — Stanley's signature product did not contain a drop of actual snake oil, and hundreds of consumers discovered they had been had.

It was probably around then that snake oil became symbolic of fraud. Snake oil salesmen and traveling doctors became stock characters in American Westerns. The first written usage of the phrase appeared in Stephen Vincent Benet's epic 1927 poem John Brown’s Body, when the poet refers to “Crooked creatures of a thousand dubious trades ... sellers of snake-oil balm and lucky rings.” About 30 years later, playwright Eugene O’Neill referred to snake oil in his 1956 play The Iceman Cometh, when a character suggested that a rival was “standing on a street corner in hell right now, making suckers of the damned, telling them there’s nothing like snake oil for a bad burn.”

As for what happened to Clark Stanley after it was found that his whole empire was based on a lie? He was fined $20 (that's about $429 in today’s dollars) for violating the food and drug act and for “misbranding” his product by “falsely and fraudulently represent[ing] it as a remedy for all pain.”

Stanley did not dispute the charges.

- A History Of ‘Snake Oil Salesmen’, NPR.org, August 26, 2013.

2. In the 1850s, America was full of self-proclaimed doctors peddling patent medicines that, if they didn’t kill you, rarely cured you. It took doctors and regulators decades to extinguish fraud and ban toxic products. Now, claims Dr. James Madara, head of the American Medical Association (AMA), we are entering a similar era, a “digital dystopia” of direct-to-consumer digital health products, apps, and ineffective electronic health records.

This is the digital snake oil of the early 21st century,” Madara SAID at the annual meeting of the country’s largest physicians group on June 11. “Just as in the mid-19th century when we separated the useful anti-toxins and compounds like aspirin from Stanley’s snake oil remedy, today we’re tasked with separating the digital snake oil from the useful —and potentially magnificent—digital tools.” Despite the potential for progress, he said, “appearing in disguise among these positive products are other digital so-called advancements that don’t have an appropriate evidence base, or that just don’t work that well—or that actually impede care, confuse patients, and waste our time.”

That’s a shot across the bow for entrepreneurs in digital health, which is being touted as a way for medicine to enhance patient care, rein in costs and improve peoples’ lives. There are some success stories to be sure. Robotic surgery, telemedicine, and better records have all made headway in hospitals. Apps show some promise as well. A 2015 study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research found that three out of nine app-only interventions led to a statistically significant improvement for people to manage symptoms of chronic diseases.

But the lightly-regulated industry of medical apps is still a mess. In 2015, so-called melanoma detection apps MelApp and Mole Detective were fined thousands of dollar by the Federal Trade Commission and barred from claiming they could detect skin cancer. Two recent studies also called the effectiveness of most apps into question. A Commonwealth Fund study examining 1,000 health-care apps for chronic diseases found only 43% of iOS apps and 27% of Android apps were likely to be useful. A second study by the Institute for Healthcare Informatics analyzed 40,000+ health-care apps in the US Apple iTunes app store (mostly in the diet and exercise category) and found a majority do little more than provide information from a mix of sources. Madara said the future was not technology to bypass physicians. “A more promising digital future can be envisioned that enhances the physician-patient relationship, produces better and more efficient care, and allows more time for physician-patient interactions—the type of outcome that has been so falsely promised by much of the current digital snake oil,” he said. Madara lamented that technology was turning doctors into the world’s most expensive data-entry workforce: an AMA study found 50% of physicians’ time was at the keyboard, compared to a third spent interacting with patients.

- The head of the American Medical Association calls many health apps pure “snake oil”, QZ.com, June 18, 2016.

3. As the Trump team struggles mightily to portray a tax plan that would disproportionately reward the wealthy—and Trump himself—as pro-working class, the Treasury Department has reportedly suppressed a government analysis that exposes as false President Donald Trump’s central claim that workers, not rich corporate shareholders, would be the primary beneficiaries of a massive reduction in the corporate tax rate.

The Wall Street Journal's Richard Rubin first reported that the analysis—published in 2012 by the Office of Tax Analysis (OTA)—was deleted from the Treasury Department's website on Thursday.

The suppressed study (pdf) demonstrated that “workers pay 18 percent of the corporate tax while owners of capital pay 82 percent,” Rubin noted, a breakdown that the Trump administration and the Republican Party has effectively reversed in selling their proposals to the American public.

OTA’s conclusions were “in line with many economists’ views and close to estimates from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) and Congressional Budget Office,” Rubin adds. “The JCT, which will evaluate tax bills in Congress, estimates that capital bears 75 percent of the long-run corporate-tax burden, with labor paying the rest.”

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has argued, against mountains of contrary evidence, that it is in fact workers who end up bearing the brunt of taxes on corporate profits, thus allowing him to paint a massive rate reduction—which Trump has proposed—as a boon for the working class.

As The Week’s Jeff Spross observes, this is a common right-wing argument. But while conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation claim that corporate tax cuts lead to higher wages for workers, the last several decades of evidence indicate the opposite, Spross concludes.

“[W]henever a company gets a windfall,” Spross writes, “the money goes to wealthy shareholders, CEOs, and the lucky members of the upper class.”

Many argued that the Treasury Department’s removal of the OTA paper amounts to blatant suppression of contradictory evidence in the service of selling “snake oil” to the American public.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called Trump’s tax plan a “scam” and denounced Treasury’s efforts to hide opposing evidence in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

“History has shown most of the pockets lined by corporate tax cuts are found in wealthy shareholder suits,” Wyden concluded. “It is disturbing the Treasury Department is burying research proving that trickle-down economics harms American workers.”

- Trump Accused of Burying Research Showing Trickle-Down Tax Cuts Just ‘Snake Oil’ Scam, CommonDreams.org, September 29, 2017.

本文僅代表作者本人觀點,與本網立場無關。歡迎大家討論學術問題,尊重他人,禁止人身攻擊和發布一切違反國家現行法律法規的內容。

About the author:

Snake oil?

Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

(作者:張欣 編輯:丹妮)

上一篇 : Crocodile tears?
下一篇 : Egg on the face?

 
中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883561聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。

中國日報網雙語新聞

掃描左側二維碼

添加Chinadaily_Mobile
你想看的我們這兒都有!

中國日報雙語手機報

點擊左側圖標查看訂閱方式

中國首份雙語手機報
學英語看資訊一個都不能少!

關注和訂閱

本文相關閱讀
人氣排行
熱搜詞
 
精華欄目
 

閱讀

詞匯

視聽

翻譯

口語

合作

 

關于我們 | 聯系方式 | 招聘信息

Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved. None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 版權聲明:本網站所刊登的中國日報網英語點津內容,版權屬中國日報網所有,未經協議授權,禁止下載使用。 歡迎愿意與本網站合作的單位或個人與我們聯系。

電話:8610-84883645

傳真:8610-84883500

Email: languagetips@chinadaily.com.cn

波多野结衣办公室双飞_制服 丝袜 综合 日韩 欧美_网站永久看片免费_欧美一级片在线免费观看_免费视频91蜜桃_精产国品一区二区三区_97超碰免费在线观看_欧美做受喷浆在线观看_国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb_麻豆精品国产传媒
日本成人在线看| 色婷婷免费视频| 天天操天天操天天操天天操天天操| 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院| 午夜精品久久久| 久久人妻少妇嫩草av无码专区 | 国产成人av资源| 中国1级黄色片| 国产亚洲va综合人人澡精品| 国产在线视频一区二区三区| 调教驯服丰满美艳麻麻在线视频 | 久久成人久久爱| 能免费看av的网站| 2020国产精品自拍| 国产一区 二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久豆腐| 欧美激情自拍偷拍| 成人高清视频免费观看| 国产又爽又黄网站| 一片黄亚洲嫩模| 污污污www精品国产网站| 日韩欧美亚洲另类制服综合在线| 麻豆精品新av中文字幕| 国产美女网站视频| 亚洲欧美中日韩| 一个人看的视频www| 88在线观看91蜜桃国自产| 日韩和欧美一区二区三区| 欧美黄色激情视频| 欧美国产日韩在线观看| 99久久99久久精品免费看蜜桃| 欧美亚洲国产一区在线观看网站| 午夜亚洲国产au精品一区二区| 四虎永久免费影院| 欧美经典一区二区| 99re成人精品视频| 91精品欧美一区二区三区综合在| 久99久精品视频免费观看| chinese全程对白| 一区二区在线观看免费视频播放 | 日韩黄色免费观看| 日韩欧美在线一区二区三区| 韩国三级中文字幕hd久久精品| 成人三级视频在线观看| 亚洲激情男女视频| 野花社区视频在线观看| 日本一区二区成人| 自拍视频第一页| 欧美一级欧美三级| 国产福利精品一区| 欧美精品久久久久久久久老牛影院| 看片网站欧美日韩| 色综合天天视频在线观看| 天天色天天爱天天射综合| 五月婷婷六月香| 亚洲午夜三级在线| 波多野结衣家庭教师在线观看 | 中文字幕+乱码+中文字幕一区| 91老师国产黑色丝袜在线| 日韩免费性生活视频播放| 国产mv日韩mv欧美| 91精品国产aⅴ一区二区| 国产精品一品二品| 91麻豆精品国产91久久久久久 | 国产盗摄一区二区三区在线| 午夜国产精品一区| 四虎地址8848| 天堂va蜜桃一区二区三区漫画版| 亚洲一级黄色录像| 亚洲国产你懂的| 日韩国产第一页| 日韩精品五月天| 福利所第一导航| 久久精品久久99精品久久| 色视频成人在线观看免| 久久99热99| 欧美日韩国产bt| 国产成人av一区| 日韩欧美国产不卡| 91色在线porny| 国产香蕉久久精品综合网| 催眠调教后宫乱淫校园| 国产精品国产三级国产三级人妇| 青青草视频成人| 亚洲一区二区三区自拍| 91麻豆精品成人一区二区| 97精品人妻一区二区三区蜜桃| 91精品国产黑色紧身裤美女| 99久久久国产精品免费蜜臀| 欧美精品一区二区三区高清aⅴ| 最新国产精品自拍| 亚洲欧美综合另类在线卡通| 国产无遮挡在线观看| 日韩成人免费电影| 欧美日韩一区不卡| 99久久综合色| 国产精品久久久久桃色tv| 亚洲码无人客一区二区三区| 亚洲a一区二区| 欧美性一级生活| zzijzzij亚洲日本少妇熟睡| 欧美激情在线免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽| 免费亚洲电影在线| 7878成人国产在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av无码网站| 亚洲精品中文在线影院| 亚洲国产美女视频| 国产a视频精品免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久久久夜| 国产精品1000部啪视频| 丝瓜av网站精品一区二区| 欧美日韩国产成人在线91| 91美女视频网站| 尤物av一区二区| 欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区 | 极品粉嫩小仙女高潮喷水久久| 亚洲一区二区综合| 在线观看国产日韩| 午夜诱惑痒痒网| 一区二区三区在线免费播放 | 色狠狠av一区二区三区| 成人天堂资源www在线| 中文字幕 久热精品 视频在线 | 菠萝蜜视频在线观看一区| 国产精品福利一区| 放荡的美妇在线播放| 成人蜜臀av电影| 亚洲男人的天堂av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 香蕉久久久久久av成人| 亚洲第一狼人社区| 在线综合+亚洲+欧美中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久7777| 中文字幕av一区 二区| 制服下的诱惑暮生| 一区二区三区四区在线播放| 欧美性三三影院| 少妇高潮一区二区三区喷水| 日本aⅴ亚洲精品中文乱码| 91精品国产欧美日韩| 精品人妻一区二区三区香蕉| 美女视频第一区二区三区免费观看网站| 欧美v国产在线一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线观看| 国产一区二区美女诱惑| 国产精品美女久久久久久久久 | 图片区小说区区亚洲影院| 91精品午夜视频| 精品无人区无码乱码毛片国产 | 风韵丰满熟妇啪啪区老熟熟女| 亚洲韩国精品一区| 日韩亚洲欧美一区| 337人体粉嫩噜噜噜| 成人精品视频一区| 亚洲永久精品国产| 日韩精品在线看片z| 女教师淫辱の教室蜜臀av软件| 成人精品国产福利| 亚洲国产另类精品专区| 精品国产人成亚洲区| 日韩欧美国产成人精品免费| 99热这里只有精品2| 日本一区中文字幕| 中文字幕欧美激情| 欧美日精品一区视频| 成年人网站免费在线观看| 国产成人在线免费| 亚洲一区二区视频在线| 久久亚洲精精品中文字幕早川悠里| 日本午夜在线观看| 国产人妻黑人一区二区三区| 精品午夜久久福利影院 | av影院午夜一区| 视频一区中文字幕国产| 国产亚洲一区字幕| 欧美三级日韩三级| 第一次破处视频| 91免费国产在线| 麻豆精品一二三| 亚洲日本va午夜在线影院| 欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看| 影音先锋男人看片资源| 老熟女高潮一区二区三区| 国产乱对白刺激视频不卡| 一区二区免费在线播放| 久久久久久久久岛国免费| 欧美性色综合网| 懂色av粉嫩av蜜臀av一区二区三区| 国产精品成人免费一区久久羞羞| 国产一区不卡视频| 五月天婷婷综合| 国产精品久久久久久福利一牛影视| 91精品一区二区三区久久久久久 | 极品少妇xxxx偷拍精品少妇| 一区二区三区中文在线| 国产香蕉久久精品综合网| 在线成人小视频| 欧洲猛交xxxx乱大交3| 成人乱码一区二区三区av|