波多野结衣办公室双飞_制服 丝袜 综合 日韩 欧美_网站永久看片免费_欧美一级片在线免费观看_免费视频91蜜桃_精产国品一区二区三区_97超碰免费在线观看_欧美做受喷浆在线观看_国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb_麻豆精品国产传媒

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / HK Macao

Judge-led inquiry ensures independence, professionalism, and impartiality

By Fu Kin-chi | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-12-05 13:30
Share
Share - WeChat

Fu Kin-chi says the appointment of a review committee reaffirms HK's commitment to the rule of law at a critical moment

The deadly fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po has sent shockwaves through Hong Kong society; the tragedy demands a response that is not only swift and compassionate but also thorough, transparent, and authoritative. In announcing the establishment of an independent review committee to be chaired by a judge, Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu has made a decisive and commendable decision. This move is of significant legal and governance importance, firmly aligning with the core principles of a rule-of-law society and demonstrating the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government's commitment to accountability and public safety.

First, it is a solemn and statutorily grounded response. The chief executive is not relying on the powers granted by the Commissions of Inquiry Ordinance (Cap. 86) but instead appointing an independent inquiry panel based on the executive authority conferred by Article 48 of the Basic Law. This authority empowers the chief executive to be responsible for implementing laws, determining government policies, and issuing administrative directives, thereby granting the power to establish and appoint independent investigation panels to examine specific incidents.

The decision to invoke an independent inquiry panel represents the activation of one of Hong Kong's most rigorous investigative instruments. This is not an ad-hoc administrative panel but a formal inquiry established under clear legal authority. By appointing a judge to lead it, the government underscored the utmost seriousness with which it treats this major public safety incident. This action transcends routine administrative review; it is a direct and formal acknowledgment of the government's fundamental responsibility to protect its people and to relentlessly pursue the truth in the wake of disaster. It fulfills a core duty of governance and robustly upholds the public's right to know and the imperative of social justice.

Second, it clearly displays the judicial leadership demonstrating the bedrock of credibility and expertise.

The choice of a judicial figure as chairperson is pivotal. It ensures that the inquiry operates with a level of independence, professionalism, and impartiality that is beyond reproach. Judges are trained to evaluate evidence dispassionately, free from political or external influence. Their legal expertise is indispensable for navigating complex factual matrices, interpreting regulations, and determining causal relationships. The conclusions and recommendations stemming from such a judicially-led process carry inherent weight and authority. They will provide an unassailable foundation for formulating concrete, evidence-based reforms in fire safety standards, building management protocols, emergency service coordination, and crisis response mechanisms — addressing systemic gaps rather than merely superficial symptoms.

Third, it shows transparency as a cornerstone of public trust.

The government's pledge to make the inquiry report public is an essential component of procedural justice. Secrecy breeds suspicion; transparency fosters trust. In a mature society governed by the rule of law, open scrutiny of such critical investigations is nonnegotiable. Publishing the full report allows for public oversight, enables academic and professional analysis, and ensures that the lessons learned are fully integrated into public consciousness and policy. This commitment to transparency is crucial for healing societal trauma, rebuilding confidence in public institutions, and demonstrating that the government has nothing to hide in its pursuit of truth and accountability.

Fourth, it helps counter misconceptions: efficacy, power, and the lessons from Grenfell. Some commentators have mistakenly questioned the efficacy and authority of an independent review committee, suggesting that a nonstatutory body lacks sufficient power or credibility. This critique is fundamentally flawed. In fact, there are successful precedents of commissioning nonstatutory committees to conduct inquiry into major incidents. For instance, a nonstatutory committee was established in the United Kingdom last year to investigate the deaths of 27 migrants in the English Channel; a nonstatutory committee was formed to investigate a fatal bus accident on Tai Po Road that resulted in 19 deaths and 65 injuries in 2018.

Moreover, the misguided preference for an alternative, potentially more cumbersome "statutory tribunal" model ignores the critical virtue of focused efficiency. A compelling and cautionary parallel is the investigation into the Grenfell Tower fire in London. Established as a full statutory public inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005, its process has been marred by extreme protraction. Years have passed with volumes of evidence, lengthy hearing phases, and interim reports, yet final conclusions and actionable recommendations remain pending for many survivors and bereaved families. This drawn-out process, while thorough, has itself become a source of prolonged anguish and delayed justice.

In stark contrast, a judge-led independent committee in Hong Kong is designed to be more streamlined and outcome-oriented. It can cut through procedural complexity to identify key failures and urgent recommendations without getting bogged down in indefinite proceedings. The primary objective is not a decades-long legal spectacle but a timely, authoritative, and actionable verdict that leads directly to preventative measures. The Grenfell experience powerfully argues for a model that balances comprehensive investigation with procedural efficiency — a balance Hong Kong's chosen path is poised to achieve.

Fifth, it expedites from inquiry to action: the path forward.

The ultimate value of the inquiry lies in its capacity to drive meaningful change. Its recommendations will likely span a wide spectrum, from urgent revisions to the Fire Safety (Buildings) Ordinance and the Buildings Ordinance, to enhanced inspection regimes for older housing estates, improved interdepartmental coordination during emergencies, and public education campaigns. Because the inquiry's findings will carry judicial gravitas, they will create powerful momentum for the executive and legislative branches to act swiftly in implementing reforms. This creates a clear pathway to systemic improvement, leading to a demonstrably safer Hong Kong.

Upholding the rule of law with resolve and pragmatism

The chief executive's decision to appoint an independent judge-led committee is a masterstroke of principled and pragmatic governance. It reaffirms Hong Kong's commitment to the rule of law at a critical moment, leveraging the highest standards of legal investigation to serve the public interest. By choosing a model that guarantees independence, ensures efficiency, and promises transparency, the HKSAR government is taking the most responsible path possible. This approach honors the victims, serves justice, and fortifies the city's foundations against future calamities. It is the definitive response a just and resilient society must provide.

The author is a law professor, director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, and president of the Association for the Promotion of Rule of Law, Education and Technologies.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
波多野结衣办公室双飞_制服 丝袜 综合 日韩 欧美_网站永久看片免费_欧美一级片在线免费观看_免费视频91蜜桃_精产国品一区二区三区_97超碰免费在线观看_欧美做受喷浆在线观看_国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb_麻豆精品国产传媒
欧美浪妇xxxx高跟鞋交| 夜夜嗨av一区二区三区| 99久久夜色精品国产网站| 久久久精品一品道一区| 蜜桃久久久久久久| 欧美精品欧美极品欧美激情| 欧美精品乱码久久久久久按摩 | 欧美一区三区四区| 亚洲电影一区二区三区| 中文字幕99页| 在线不卡欧美精品一区二区三区| 亚洲图片欧美一区| 少妇献身老头系列| 91精品欧美一区二区三区综合在| 五月婷婷久久丁香| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区观看| 欧美一区二区在线看| 日韩和欧美的一区| 亚洲色成人网站www永久四虎| 精品国产91九色蝌蚪| 国产一区二区电影| 美国一级片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专播品爱网 | av午夜一区麻豆| 色婷婷国产精品| 一区二区三区四区国产精品| 国产精品一级无码| 欧美一区二区在线观看| 久久99精品久久久久久国产越南 | 国产99久久久精品| 一本色道久久综合亚洲aⅴ蜜桃| 亚洲男同1069视频| 性活交片大全免费看| 欧美一二三四在线| 国产一区二区三区日韩| 国产97免费视频| 亚洲图片欧美色图| 草草影院第一页| 国产女同互慰高潮91漫画| 不卡影院免费观看| 欧美肥妇毛茸茸| 黑人巨大精品欧美黑白配亚洲| 小早川怜子一区二区的演员表| 亚洲女同女同女同女同女同69| 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇| 久久综合久久综合亚洲| 成人美女视频在线观看18| 欧美日韩在线三区| 卡一卡二国产精品| 日本青青草视频| 亚洲成av人片在线| 久久亚洲AV无码专区成人国产| 一区精品在线播放| 中文字幕第3页| 国产女主播视频一区二区| 91精产国品一二三| 久久香蕉国产线看观看99| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品| 日韩三级中文字幕| 成+人+亚洲+综合天堂| 欧美一级片在线看| 国产精品亚洲午夜一区二区三区 | 亚洲va欧美va人人爽午夜| 天天干天天操天天拍| 一区二区免费视频| 亚洲一级片在线播放| 亚洲综合色噜噜狠狠| 永久免费毛片在线观看| 亚洲一区二区黄色| 国产3级在线观看| 丝袜a∨在线一区二区三区不卡| 91视频青青草| 免费看精品久久片| 在线免费观看成人短视频| 看电视剧不卡顿的网站| 欧洲在线/亚洲| 韩国三级中文字幕hd久久精品| 一个色妞综合视频在线观看| 亚洲视频天天射| 色天天综合色天天久久| 蜜桃视频在线观看一区| 在线免费观看日韩欧美| 国产精品中文字幕一区二区三区| 欧美日韩激情一区二区三区| 丁香婷婷深情五月亚洲| 日韩美女视频在线| 亚洲区 欧美区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲毛片 | 久久久99精品免费观看不卡| 精品人妻一区二区免费| 一区在线中文字幕| 亚洲不卡的av| 另类中文字幕网| 在线不卡a资源高清| 99久久国产综合精品色伊| 久久久久久99久久久精品网站| 岛国精品资源网站| 一区二区三区中文字幕精品精品 | 欧美激情在线观看视频免费| 亚洲美女精品视频| 亚洲三级视频在线观看| 亚洲色图27p| 久久99精品国产.久久久久久| 欧美精品视频www在线观看| eeuss鲁一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩在线观看| 免费看黄色av| 喷白浆一区二区| 91精品国产一区二区三区蜜臀| 在线观看免费看片| 中文字幕亚洲一区二区av在线| 女性裸体视频网站| 激情亚洲综合在线| 久久这里都是精品| 国产 欧美 在线| 美腿丝袜亚洲一区| 欧美电影免费观看高清完整版在线观看 | 色婷婷综合久久久中文一区二区| 国产福利一区二区三区视频| 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 国产高潮呻吟久久| 久久激情五月婷婷| 欧美电影免费观看高清完整版在线观看| 日本黄色录像片| 日韩黄色免费网站| 日韩精品一区二| 先锋影音av在线| 国产一区二区不卡老阿姨| 国产日韩欧美精品电影三级在线| 毛片aaaaaa| 国产精品一区二区三区四区| 欧美激情综合五月色丁香| 欧美爱爱免费视频| 不卡电影一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂2016| 欧美亚州韩日在线看免费版国语版| 性生活在线视频| 亚洲大片免费看| 欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 欧美 日韩 国产 一区二区三区| 国产成人在线免费| 日韩一区中文字幕| 欧美日韩在线播放一区| 四虎精品一区二区| 欧美aⅴ一区二区三区视频| 精品精品国产高清一毛片一天堂| 中国女人特级毛片| 成人午夜视频免费看| 亚洲麻豆国产自偷在线| 欧美日韩成人综合天天影院| 色噜噜在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品三级视频| 在线视频中文字幕一区二区| 妖精视频一区二区| 美女国产一区二区三区| 国产欧美一区二区三区网站| 国产精品老熟女一区二区| 香蕉久久久久久av成人| 人人狠狠综合久久亚洲| 国产日韩欧美综合一区| 日本韩国一区二区三区| 影音先锋黄色资源| 国产精品原创巨作av| 亚洲精品视频在线观看网站| 91精品欧美综合在线观看最新| 久久婷婷五月综合| 99久久777色| 蜜臀a∨国产成人精品| 日本一区二区免费在线观看视频| 91福利国产精品| 一区二区不卡免费视频| 国产成人精品一区二| 亚洲一区二区四区蜜桃| 久久综合久久综合久久综合| 91高清视频在线| 中文字幕xxx| 不卡高清视频专区| 日本va欧美va欧美va精品| 国产精品每日更新在线播放网址 | 成人91在线观看| 日本午夜一本久久久综合| 中文字幕精品三区| 欧美人伦禁忌dvd放荡欲情| 四季av中文字幕| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久9色| 日韩不卡一区二区| 一区二区中文视频| 精品黑人一区二区三区久久| 91黄视频在线观看| 午夜精产品一区二区在线观看的| 99国产精品99久久久久久| 蜜臀av一区二区三区| 亚洲人成精品久久久久| 精品黑人一区二区三区久久| 欧美吻胸吃奶大尺度电影| 网爆门在线观看| 中文成人无字幕乱码精品区| a级精品国产片在线观看| 久久福利资源站|